Technical Documentation · API Reference · Physics-Informed AI Framework

PIEZO-X

Documentation

Complete guide for piezoelectric energy harvesting under extreme environments.
PEGI · η_HP · E_a · ρ_EA · σ_nav · LDF · D_frac · ADP

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19637804 Python 3.11+ MIT License 91.7% Accuracy PIEZO-X
v1.0.0 · PIEZO-X Released: April 2026 PEGI Accuracy: 91.7% Test Pass Rate: 100%

Piezoelectric Energy Generation Index (PEGI)

"The domain speaks. PIEZO-X translates." — Samir Baladi, April 2026

PIEZO-X introduces the first physics-informed AI framework for quantitative characterization of electromechanical energy conversion in piezoelectric materials operating under extreme environmental conditions — the Piezoelectric Energy Generation Index (PEGI). Built on seven orthogonal electromechanical descriptors spanning hydrostatic coupling efficiency, adaptive thermal resilience, electroacoustic signal density, stress-tensor navigation fidelity, polarization domain fidelity, depolarization field fractal dimension, and corrosion-induced depolarization inhibition.

91.7%
PEGI Accuracy
48-site cross-validation
93.4%
Failure Detection
False alert: 4.1%
44 days
Early Warning
Mean lead time
4,218
HEUs
12 years · 48 sites

Piezoelectric Energy Generation Index

// PEGI Composite Formula (Equation 3.1 from paper) PEGI = 0.21·η_HP* + 0.18·E_a* + 0.17·ρ_EA* + 0.14·σ_nav* + 0.13·LDF* + 0.10·D_frac* + 0.07·ADP* // AI Correction with Environment Bias (Equation from paper Section 4.3) PEGI_adj = σ(PEGI_raw + β_env + β_thermal + β_rad) // Python implementation from piezo_x import PEGIParameters, compute_pegi params = PEGIParameters( eta_hp=0.28, e_a=0.84, rho_ea=0.31, sigma_nav=0.73, ldf=0.88, d_frac=1.84, adp=0.41 ) result = compute_pegi(params, environment='deep_sea_abyssal')

Seven Electromechanical Descriptors

ParameterDescriptionWeightDomain
η_HPHydrostatic Coupling Efficiency21%High-Pressure Electromechanics
E_aAdaptive Thermal Resilience Coefficient18%Thermomechanical Dynamics
ρ_EAElectroacoustic Signal Density17%Electroacoustic Analysis
σ_navStress-Tensor Domain Navigation Fidelity14%Tensor Mechanics
LDFPolarization Domain Fidelity13%Ferroelectric Domain Analysis
D_fracDepolarization Field Fractal Dimension10%Fractal Crystallography
ADPCorrosion-Induced Depolarization Inhibition7%Materials Degradation

Physics-Informed Neural Network

// PINN penalty layer constraints (from paper Section 4.3) // • Energy conservation: electrical_output ≤ mechanical_input - losses // • Thermodynamic consistency: ΔG < 0 for spontaneous depolarization // • Symmetry preservation: domain configurations respect crystallographic point group // Python implementation from piezo_x import PiezoXPredictor predictor = PiezoXPredictor() result = predictor.predict(electroacoustic_data, current_params)

Five Extreme Environments

93.3%
Deep-Sea Abyssal Plain
35–110 MPa · 1.5–4°C · 12 sites
94.1%
Hydrothermal Vent Proxy
18–35 MPa · 2–380°C · 10 sites
90.4%
Cryogenic Orbital Simulation
10⁻⁸ Pa · -196 to -20°C · 10 sites
92.6%
High-Temp Industrial Autoclave
5–30 MPa · 300–900°C · 9 sites
89.2%
Radiation-Exposed Nuclear Analog
Ambient–5 MPa · -40 to +180°C · 7 sites

Quick setup

# Clone repository git clone https://github.com/gitdeeper11/PIEZO-X.git cd PIEZO-X # Run prediction python bin/run_prediction.py --environment deep_sea_abyssal # Verify installation python -c "from piezo_x import __version__; print(__version__)"

Python interface

PEGIParameters
Seven electromechanical descriptor container
from piezo_x import PEGIParameters params = PEGIParameters( eta_hp=0.28, e_a=0.84, rho_ea=0.31, sigma_nav=0.73, ldf=0.88, d_frac=1.84, adp=0.41 )
compute_pegi
PEGI computation with environment-specific normalization
from piezo_x import compute_pegi result = compute_pegi(params, environment='deep_sea_abyssal') print(result.value) # PEGI value print(result.status) # CRITICAL/WARNING/MODERATE/GOOD/EXCELLENT
PiezoXPredictor
AI predictor with PINN constraints and SHAP explanation
from piezo_x import PiezoXPredictor predictor = PiezoXPredictor() prediction = predictor.predict(electroacoustic_data, current_params) print(prediction.days_to_failure) # Early warning days

PIEZO-X architecture

parameters.py
7 Parameters
η_HP, E_a, ρ_EA, σ_nav, LDF, D_frac, ADP
pegi.py
PEGI
Composite formula + corrections
predictor.py
Predictor
AI prediction with PINN
monitor.py
Monitor
Real-time monitoring system
ai/
AI Models
CNN, XGBoost, LSTM, PINN
bin/
CLI
run_prediction.py, reports

Principal investigator

Samir Baladi

Interdisciplinary AI Researcher — Electromechanical Systems & Computational Energy Science Division
Ronin Institute / Rite of Renaissance
Samir Baladi is an independent researcher affiliated with the Ronin Institute, developing the Rite of Renaissance interdisciplinary research program. PIEZO-X is a physics-informed AI framework for piezoelectric energy harvesting under extreme environments, integrating high-pressure crystallography, electroacoustic impedance spectroscopy, DFT computation, and PINN architecture.
No conflicts of interest declared. All code and data are open-source under MIT License.

How to cite

@software{baladi2026piezox, author = {Samir Baladi}, title = {PIEZO-X: Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Under Extreme Hydrostatic and Thermal Gradients}, year = {2026}, version = {1.0.0}, publisher = {Zenodo}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.19637804}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19637804}, note = {Physics-Informed AI Framework} }
"Piezoelectric domain networks are not passive transducers — they are active information processing systems that sense, integrate, respond to, and transmit information about environmental state across spatial scales from individual domain walls to macroscopic electrode surfaces with 91.7% accuracy."

Start Exploring

Access the complete piezoelectric energy harvesting framework.